itd-146 places a changelog verb in the root help's agent block; 04-naming's register of exempt surfaces, which says every exemption is on the record, does not list it.

itd-146 places a changelog verb in the root help's agent block; 04-naming's register of exempt surfaces, which says every exemption is on the record, does not list it.

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-146-abcd-s-help-renders-in-labelled-command.md:169 — "changelog sits in the agent block"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/04-naming.md:56 — "The remaining surfaces are exempt for the plain reason that no maritime cognate"

itd-146's decision 3 says 'changelog sits in the agent block' of the root help, and the intent keeps changelog a top-level verb rather than folding it under launch. 04-naming introduces its list with 'The remaining surfaces are exempt for the plain reason that no maritime cognate' adds meaning, and says each exemption is registered so that it is a decision rather than an omission; changelog is not in the list. Either the register is incomplete or the help names a verb the register does not know.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 204.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. helpgroups.go has no changelog placement and the stale-usage table answers the retired name with launch --dry-run; the README says changelog is in neither block.