The agent holding the shape-classification third role is `intent-auditor` in the mental model and `intent-fidelity-reviewer` in itd-34.

The agent holding the shape-classification third role is intent-auditor in the mental model and intent-fidelity-reviewer in itd-34.

A naming conflict (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md:72 — "A continuous audit role (the third role on intent-auditor"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:88 — "intent-fidelity-reviewer shape-classification role (third role)"

Both documents describe the same continuous third role that suggests reclassifications, but the brief puts it on intent-auditor and itd-34 puts it on intent-fidelity-reviewer. That is two names for one agent, and a reader cannot tell from the record whether they are the same agent.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 210.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Both names were true when written; itd-123 (shipped) states the rename and agents/ carries only intent-auditor, so a later record already says which holds.