Development record
Invariant 17 makes the intent-to-spec relation 1:n; itd-34 says a standalone intent maps 1:1 to a spec.
issuewontfixminoriss-2610262032024089
Invariant 17 makes the intent-to-spec relation 1:n; itd-34 says a standalone intent maps 1:1 to a spec.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/02-constraints/03-invariants.md:171— "the intent↔spec relation is 1:n" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:21— "A standalone intent maps 1:1 to a flow-nextspec"
The brief's invariant states that an intent owns one or more specs and ships when its last spec closes. itd-34 asserts that a standalone intent maps one-to-one to a spec. Both make a claim about the same relation and cannot both hold.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 212.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Both ends were true when written and the later ADR says which holds. The 1:n edit to the live document is tracked under iss-2610262030410509.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262032024089 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262032024089-invariant-17-makes-the-intent-to-spec.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-34Intents Promote In Three Flavours — Standalone, Bundle-Member, Disciplinerelated
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- iss-2610262030410509Invariant 17 makes the intent-to-spec relation 1:n; the intent chapter's kinds table maps a standalone intent to one spec (1:1)