The context page says `abcd intent new` is refused; itd-4's `capture promote` calls `/abcd:intent new`.

The context page says abcd intent new is refused; itd-4's capture promote calls /abcd:intent new.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/02-context.md:11 — "new is not a sub-verb: abcd intent new is refused and names the quoted create."
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-4-issue-capture.md:35 — "capture promote <iss-N> — promote an iss-N entry to an intent draft (calls /abcd:intent new with the entry body + bidirectional link)"

The brief says new is not a sub-verb and that abcd intent new is refused, pointing at the quoted create. itd-4 defines the promote path as a call to /abcd:intent new. A promote built from itd-4 calls a form the surface refuses.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 218.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. itd-4's scope text names the old spelling but its audit notes already say the promote path calls intent.CreateDraft instead, and a later shipped intent removed the verb.