Development record

The scope page counts eighteen agents; itd-34 says the agent count in the catalog stays at 15.

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262032044265

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/04-scope.md:32 — "(eighteen agents — the canonical roster is the catalog in"
End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-34-three-intent-kinds.md:98 — "The agent count in the catalog stays at 15"

The brief's plumbing paragraph states eighteen agents in the canonical catalog. itd-34 asserts that the catalog's count stays at fifteen. The two give different counts for the same roster.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 216.

Grounds

declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. agents/ now holds 18 definitions, as the scope page says; the 15 was a point-in-time count in a shipped intent, whose roles-not-agents point still holds.

Frontmatter

id	iss-2610262032044265
type	issue
lifecycle	wontfix
severity	nitpick

.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262032044265-the-scope-page-counts-eighteen-agents.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗

References1

itd-34Intents Promote In Three Flavours — Standalone, Bundle-Member, Disciplinerelated

mentions1

dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.