The mental model calls itd-60 planned, but itd-60 sits on the shipped shelf

The mental model calls itd-60 planned, but itd-60 sits on the shipped shelf

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md:79 — "This work is governed by the planned itd-60/itd-61 doc-fidelity + derivation loop"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-60-doc-fidelity-anti-drift.md:32 — "abcd gains a doc-fidelity gate: a change cannot call itself shipped while"

03-mental-model says the framework-provided discipline is governed by 'the planned itd-60/itd-61 doc-fidelity + derivation loop'. itd-60, the doc-fidelity gate, is in intents/shipped/. The brief is meant to record the current state, but the lifecycle state it gives for itd-60 is contradicted by the shelf itd-60 sits on.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 252.