itd-46 treats `list` as a corpus-scope intent scan verb that already exists; the context page says there is no plain `list` sub-verb

itd-46 treats list as a corpus-scope intent scan verb that already exists; the context page says there is no plain list sub-verb

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-46-abcd-intent-quoted-text-create-symmetric.md:78 — "scan verbs (list, consistency, shape) continue not to require an ID."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/02-context.md:11 — "There is no plain list sub-verb — it is folded into the bare render per SD001."

itd-46 describes list, alongside consistency and shape, as a scan verb that continues not to require an ID, an already-correct shape it leaves alone. 02-context says there is no plain list sub-verb because it is folded into the bare render per SD001. An intent sub-verb cannot both carry on unchanged and not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 253.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The intent command registers consistency, prepass, audit and the rest but no list or shape sub-verb; itd-46's own first shape is bare means status, so list had no separate job.