Development record
Ahoy says every launch verb refuses an undeclared artefact kind; launch says the cut, the archive render and the receipts check assume the plugin shape
Ahoy says every launch verb refuses an undeclared artefact kind; launch says the cut, the archive render and the receipts check assume the plugin shape
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/01-ahoy.md:826— "withholding the declaration would leave every launch verb refusing the repository" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/04-launch.md:46— "the cut, the archive render and the receipts check read an absent declaration as the plugin shape they have always assumed"
Ahoy justifies declaring application on an unattended install because withholding the declaration would leave every launch verb refusing the repository. Launch says only the preview and the scaffold refuse a repository that declared no kind, while the cut, the archive render and the receipts check read an absent declaration as the plugin shape. Ahoy's premise that every launch verb refuses is false by launch's own account of its verbs.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 255.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262032208504 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262032208504-ahoy-says-every-launch-verb-refuses-an.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗