Development record
Embark's refresh-audit modifier diffs against a disembark-time audit; disembark produces a review verdict and no audit
Embark's refresh-audit modifier diffs against a disembark-time audit; disembark produces a review verdict and no audit
A sequencing impossibility (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/03-embark.md:248— "would re-run the oracle product audit against the current lifeboat content and report the drift against the disembark-time audit" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/02-disembark.md:205— "thelifeboat-reviewerreview on the run's outputs returns a registered verdict with specific findings rather than vague approval"
Embark's design-target refresh-audit modifier would re-run the oracle product audit and report drift against the disembark-time audit. Disembark's pipeline has no audit step: its judgement over the pack is the lifeboat-reviewer's review returning a registered verdict. The modifier depends on an artefact disembark, as written, never produces, or names the review by another verb's word.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 269.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262032268272 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262032268272-embark-s-refresh-audit-modifier-diffs.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610262033072029The embark chapter still calls the judgement over a lifeboat an 'oracle product audit'; itd-125 renamed it a review everywhere