Development record
universal patterns says the voyage store is tracked under the visibility rule; embark says it is never committed
universal patterns says the voyage store is tracked under the visibility rule; embark says it is never committed
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:161— "Both are tracked under the visibility rule" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/03-embark.md:264— "root-commit SHA exactly as the history store is, and therefore never committed"
Universal patterns cites embark section 7 and says both the log tier and ~/.abcd.noindex/voyage/< source-root-sha>/ are tracked under the visibility rule. The embark chapter says the voyage store lives at the operator level, keyed on the root commit, and is therefore never committed. A store outside every repository cannot be committed, or ignored, under a repository's visibility rule.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 302.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262032400242 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262032400242-universal-patterns-says-the-voyage-store.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- iss-2610262038197762Universal patterns say the log tier and the voyage store are both tracked under the visibility rule; the voyage entry says the voyage is never committed.