This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

the lint contract counts 'previously' as change narration; launch's change-narration gate passes a bare 'previously' as present-tense prose

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262032410731

the lint contract counts 'previously' as change narration; launch's change-narration gate passes a bare 'previously' as present-tense prose

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:10 — "change-narration (past-tense drift such as "previously" or "formerly")"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/04-launch.md:303 — "Bare "now" and bare "previously" are present-tense prose and pass"

The lint contract defines the change narration it lints in docs/ as past-tense drift and gives 'previously' as an example. Launch's change-narration gate, run over the same Markdown under docs/, says a bare 'previously' is present-tense prose and passes. The term means different things in the two chapters, so the same sentence is drift to one check and acceptable to the other.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 304.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. .abcd/docs-lint.json bans the bare word as a blocker and the launch tier is a separate narrower scan of the payload, so a bare 'previously' fails the first before it reaches the second.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262032410731
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

mentions1