ahoy calls the setup answers file in the local tier an 'answers record'; the record entry says an artefact with no id and no minting command is not a record

ahoy calls the setup answers file in the local tier an 'answers record'; the record entry says an artefact with no id and no minting command is not a record

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/01-ahoy.md:874 — "answers file write one answers record through interview.Write"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record.md:57 — "an artefact with no id and no minting command is neither"

core/record reserves 'record' for an identified, filed document a command mints and a lint gate reads, and says a working-tier note or a local scratch file, having no id and no minting command, is not one. 01-ahoy calls the setup answers written into .abcd/.work.local/interviews/ an answers record, and its path-entry and provenance files records too, though none carries an id.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 310.