This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-122 says a shipped sub-verb with no table row fails the build; the launch chapter ships `smoke-pages` with no row

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262033095338

itd-122 says a shipped sub-verb with no table row fails the build; the launch chapter ships smoke-pages with no row

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/04-launch.md:964 — "abcd launch ship, abcd launch smoke-pages"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-122-the-registry-cannot-wave-its-hands-every.md:21 — "sub-verb that ships without a row fails the build"

itd-122 says surface_coverage checks every surface chapter's sub-verb table against the command tree in both directions, so a sub-verb that ships without a row fails the build. The launch chapter's generated appendix lists abcd launch smoke-pages among the shipped sub-verbs, and its prose calls it a hidden, operator-internal sub-verb. Its sub-verb table lists only archive, manifests, receipts, scaffold and ship. Either the gate exempts hidden sub-verbs, which itd-122 does not say, or the committed chapter would fail it.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 368.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The press-release line in itd-122 states the rule without the hidden-subtree exemption the README and the gate carry; the committed chapter passes the gate.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033095338
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

References1

mentions1