This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-3 puts the loader's marker block in CLAUDE.md; embark re-injects that same itd-3 block into AGENTS.md and treats claude_md as a retired target

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262033143329

itd-3 puts the loader's marker block in CLAUDE.md; embark re-injects that same itd-3 block into AGENTS.md and treats claude_md as a retired target

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/03-embark.md:132 — "saved gives AGENTS.md; skip gives no file; a retired claude_md or"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-3-modular-rules-loader.md:16 — "CLAUDE.md becomes a small marker block, not a 1000-line wall."

Embark names the block it re-injects as the modular-rules-loader block of itd-3. It writes that block into AGENTS.md, or nowhere, and treats a saved claude_md choice as retired. itd-3 says the loader turns CLAUDE.md into a small marker block owned by ahoy. A reader following itd-3 for where the block lives would write the file embark refuses to write.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 378.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Both ends were true when written and a later shipped intent and ADR name the change, which the embark chapter cites.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033143329
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

References1

mentions1