Development record
itd-2609231013154443 names `abcd changelog` as a read-only preview of the release page's intents; the launch chapter says there is no changelog verb
itd-2609231013154443 names abcd changelog as a read-only preview of the release page's intents; the launch chapter says there is no changelog verb
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/04-launch.md:23— "without starting one, and there is no separate changelog verb." - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609231013154443-every-release-arrives-with-its-own-press.md:94— "The read-only preview (abcd changelog, or thelaunchdry run) listing the"
The release-page intent's scope makes abcd changelog one of the two read-only previews that list the intents the page is composed from. The launch chapter says the launch preview is the only way to see the cut and that there is no separate changelog verb. Its acceptance says the binary refuses the retired changelog verb as an unknown command. A reader following the intent would call a verb that does not exist.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 380.
Grounds
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262033156337 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262033156337-itd-2609231013154443-names-abcd.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2609231013154443Every release arrives with a press release composed from what shippedrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.