Development record
itd-2610030810350727 requires every question's label to say who it is for; the ahoy chapter chips setup questions "Setup Q< n>", naming the interview and no addressee
itd-2610030810350727 requires every question's label to say who it is for; the ahoy chapter chips setup questions "Setup Q< n>", naming the interview and no addressee
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/01-ahoy.md:852— ""Setup Q< n>" in the order setup asks it (no total, since the gaps decide how" - End B:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2610030810350727-every-question-abcd-puts-to-a-person.md:27— "a short label saying who it is for and which question this is"
The question-layout intent says every question abcd asks carries a short label saying who it is for and which question it is, as in "Product Q2". The ahoy chapter's drawn door labels each setup question "Setup Q< n>", which names the interview and its position but not the person the question is put to. The label either names an addressee or it does not, so the setup door and the asking rule cannot both stand as written.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 383.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. 'Setup Q1' names who the question is for (the person running setup) and which question it is; the checked chip grammar lists Setup, so the setup door follows the asking rule.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262033165546 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262033165546-itd-2610030810350727-requires-every.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2610030810350727Every question abcd asks reads the same way, on a narrow window and a wide onerelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.