This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-67 has launch ship write plugin.json and tag the repo; 04-launch says the verb neither commits, tags nor publishes

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262033173969

itd-67 has launch ship write plugin.json and tag the repo; 04-launch says the verb neither commits, tags nor publishes

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-67-installable-versioned-plugin.md:47 — "/abcd:launch ship auto-selects the bump tier (patch/minor/major) via the brief §4 phase-completion detection, writes the new version into plugin.json, updates marketplace.json (version + changelog entry), tags the repo"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/04-launch.md:179 — "The verb neither commits, tags, nor publishes"

itd-67 promises that /abcd:launch ship picks the bump tier by phase-completion detection, writes the version into plugin.json, updates marketplace.json and tags the repo. 04-launch says the shipped verb neither commits, tags nor publishes, so a human and CI perform every step after the changelog heading and the release page. The same chapter also derives the tier from the records' declared impact and leaves the working-tree manifests unversioned. A ship verb cannot both tag the repo and never tag it.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 384.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. Ship code has no tag-writing step (only a tag listing for retention), and the working-tree manifests stay unversioned; the closed spec says what replaced itd-67's wording.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033173969
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1