This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-88 names the packer `disembark <repo> to <dest>`; 02-disembark makes bare disembark a read-only listing and packing the `pack` sub-verb

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262033191807

itd-88 names the packer disembark <repo> to <dest>; 02-disembark makes bare disembark a read-only listing and packing the pack sub-verb

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-88-lifeboat-coverage-experiment.md:41 — "The packer (disembark <repo> to <dest>), embark, and the round-trip"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/02-disembark.md:44 — "Bare /abcd:disembark prints the sub-verb list and flags, and mutates nothing."

itd-88 writes the packer as the bare verb with a to keyword, disembark <repo> to <dest>. 02-disembark says bare /abcd:disembark prints the sub-verb list and flags and mutates nothing, and lists packing as the pack sub-verb, which takes two positional paths. The bare form cannot both pack a lifeboat and mutate nothing.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 390.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. 02-disembark describes the shipped surface and the intent's audit already records the divergence from its promised spelling.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033191807
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1