06-capture says the filing-time match runs on the ledger's two unattended writers, but 05-intent's audit ingest is a third writer that files through the match.

06-capture says the filing-time match runs on the ledger's two unattended writers, but 05-intent's audit ingest is a third writer that files through the match.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/06-capture.md:123 — "The same match runs on the ledger's two unattended writers, through the same"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:330 — "related to the intent, with the filing-time match"

06-capture names exactly two unattended writers that run the match (promoted inbox reports and the consistency pass) and says what each must leave out of the comparison. 05-intent says a failed or undecided audit ingest captures an issue through the ledger's filer, related to the intent, with the filing-time match. 06-capture's list omits that writer, and with it any rule on which of its fixed lines stay out of the comparison.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 402.