Development record
The intent chapter stages the fidelity audit's request under the local reviews directory, while universal patterns puts the same audit's output in a review sub-tier of the log tier.
The intent chapter stages the fidelity audit's request under the local reviews directory, while universal patterns puts the same audit's output in a review sub-tier of the log tier.
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:651— "the emit path stages an ephemeral review request under.abcd/.work.local/reviews/(gitignored, report-only)" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/04-universal-patterns.md:120— "audit/review-< ts>/ (Role 1 itd-1 pass / /abcd:intent audit, itd-1)"
05-intent says the shipped audit keeps its verdict in the intent's Audit Notes, and that its emit stages an ephemeral review request under .abcd/.work.local/reviews/. 04-universal-patterns gives the single-document audit pass a per-run directory, audit/review-< ts>/, in the log tier. The two documents put the same audit's per-run artefact in different directories.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 421.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The directory in dispute sits in a tree the page itself marks as designed, not shipped, so the two pages describe different things.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262033346897 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262033346897-the-intent-chapter-stages-the-fidelity.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions2
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.
- itd-1Every Intent Has Acceptance Criteria; Every Audit Verifies Them