The capture chapter keeps a scratch-to-ledger migration as owed design, while the configuration chapter says that migration has nothing left to migrate.

The capture chapter keeps a scratch-to-ledger migration as owed design, while the configuration chapter says that migration has nothing left to migrate.

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/06-capture.md:521 — "The migration rides the dev-sync work surface"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/03-configuration.md:1200 — "so the migration this design was drawn around has nothing left to migrate"

06-capture describes a legacy scratch migration, not yet built, that rides the dev-sync work surface and has a migrator seam reserved for it. 03-configuration says capture writes the ledger directly, so the migration the dev-sync design was drawn around has nothing left to migrate. One document treats the migration as pending work and the other treats it as moot.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 424.