The intent chapter has an armed record-lint rule that checks the promote back-link, while the lint contract lists that check as an unbuilt full-corpus tier.

The intent chapter has an armed record-lint rule that checks the promote back-link, while the lint contract lists that check as an unbuilt full-corpus tier.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:511 — "related_issues_backlink flags an intent's related_issues entry whose issue's related_intents omits the intent"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:54 — "for example a promote back-link between an intent and its source issue, which needs both files in view"

05-intent names related_issues_backlink as an armed record-lint rule. It flags an intent's related_issues entry when that issue's related_intents leaves the intent out. 06-lint gives that same promote back-link as its example of a check for a full-corpus tier that is a design target and not yet built. The check is either armed in the record gate or not yet built.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 427.