This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The intent chapter describes numbered lint codes such as GL005, while the lint contract says rules are named, not numbered.

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262033404989

The intent chapter describes numbered lint codes such as GL005, while the lint contract says rules are named, not numbered.

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:472 — "Lint extractor for GL005 knows both shapes"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:14 — "The engine carries no numbered code catalogue: rules are named, not numbered"

05-intent describes, in the present tense, a lint extractor for GL005, beside the codes GL003 and GR002. 06-lint says the engine carries no numbered code catalogue and that rules are named, not numbered. Anyone following the intent chapter would create numbered codes that the lint contract rules out.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 429.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. Read in full, the section says no schema ships and no shipped check reads these fields, so it does not instruct anyone to create numbered codes.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033404989
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

mentions1