Development record
The intent chapter describes numbered lint codes such as GL005, while the lint contract says rules are named, not numbered.
The intent chapter describes numbered lint codes such as GL005, while the lint contract says rules are named, not numbered.
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:472— "Lint extractor for GL005 knows both shapes" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:14— "The engine carries no numbered code catalogue: rules are named, not numbered"
05-intent describes, in the present tense, a lint extractor for GL005, beside the codes GL003 and GR002. 06-lint says the engine carries no numbered code catalogue and that rules are named, not numbered. Anyone following the intent chapter would create numbered codes that the lint contract rules out.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 429.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. Read in full, the section says no schema ships and no shipped check reads these fields, so it does not instruct anyone to create numbered codes.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262033404989 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262033404989-the-intent-chapter-describes-numbered.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.