The intent chapter lists the armed record-lint rules and their severities by hand, while the lint contract says any literal list of rules belongs in a generated, gated region.

The intent chapter lists the armed record-lint rules and their severities by hand, while the lint contract says any literal list of rules belongs in a generated, gated region.

A scope leakage (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:502 — "The armed record-lint rules that bear on the intent tree are intent_lifecycle"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:14 — "Any literal enumeration of rules in the record belongs in a generated, gated region"

06-lint gives the armed rule set to the JSON configs, and says a literal list of rules in the record belongs only in a generated, gated region, never in a hand-kept table. 05-intent keeps its own hand-typed list of the armed record-lint rules that bear on the intent tree, with their severities. The same ground is covered twice, and the hand-kept copy can drift from the config.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 428.