The out-of-scope page says itd-27 (the grill sub-verb) is scoped into the planned phases; the intent chapter says itd-27 is superseded by itd-94 and no grill sub-verb ships.

The out-of-scope page says itd-27 (the grill sub-verb) is scoped into the planned phases; the intent chapter says itd-27 is superseded by itd-94 and no grill sub-verb ships.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/03-out-of-scope.md:166 — "itd-27 (/abcd:intent grill sub-verb + glossary), itd-28 (spec-tied reviews in the native spec review store), and itd-34 (three intent kinds with three lifecycle paths) were captured after this brief was written and are scoped into the planned phases."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:319 — "per itd-27, intents/superseded/, superseded by itd-94; no grill sub-verb ships"

03-out-of-scope lists itd-27 ('/abcd:intent grill' sub-verb + glossary) among additions that 'are scoped into the planned phases', which presents it as live, scheduled work. 05-intent records itd-27 as sitting in intents/superseded/, superseded by itd-94, with no grill sub-verb shipping. A superseded intent is not scheduled work, so the out-of-scope note cannot hold as written.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 433.