Development record
The glossary says embark writes only the four record families; the reflect chapter says embark also writes retrospectives back, sealed with the other record families.
The glossary says embark writes only the four record families; the reflect chapter says embark also writes retrospectives back, sealed with the other record families.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record.md:66— "embarkwrites only the four record families, verbatim, into their canonical locations." - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/09-reflect.md:203— "the other record families. The embark write puts them back into the new"
glossary/core/record.md fixes 'a record family' as one of the four families embark writes (ADRs, issues, intents, specs), with the example that embark writes only those four. 09-reflect says a lifeboat carries retrospectives sealed 'with the other record families' and that 'The embark write puts them back into the new voyage's store'. Either retrospectives are a fifth family that embark writes, or embark writes only four.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 446.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262033534032 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262033534032-the-glossary-says-embark-writes-only-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗