The intent chapter's kinds table maps a standalone intent to one spec (1:1); the record-families map says an intent has one or more specs.

The intent chapter's kinds table maps a standalone intent to one spec (1:1); the record-families map says an intent has one or more specs.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:83 — "One spec (1:1) | itd-3, itd-4, itd-7, most of the corpus"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record-families.md:23 — "its intent (one or more specs per intent)"

05-intent's kinds table gives standalone the mapping 'One spec (1:1)'. glossary/core/record-families.md says a spec is grouped by 'its intent (one or more specs per intent)', the 1:n relation a remainder spec depends on. A standalone intent with an open remainder spec breaks the 1:1 cell, so the two cannot both describe the relation.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 450.