itd-84 calls the intent_sota gate unbuilt; the intent surface lists intent_sota as an armed record-lint rule at warn

itd-84 calls the intent_sota gate unbuilt; the intent surface lists intent_sota as an armed record-lint rule at warn

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-84-intent-decomposition.md:122 — "the unbuilt intent_sota gate wanted"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:502 — "intent_sota (a planned/ intent carries a non-empty ## SOTA declaration, armed at warn)"

itd-84 takes SOTA-rooting into its validator as the enforcement that 'the unbuilt intent_sota gate wanted'. The intent surface lists intent_sota among the armed record-lint rules on the intent tree, flagging a planned intent with no non-empty SOTA section at warn. The gate is either unbuilt or armed, and itd-84's scope item rests on it being unbuilt.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 457.