This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-192 decides a verdict by whether 'this phase' wires the producer; the intent surface says phases are retired

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262033593092

itd-192 decides a verdict by whether 'this phase' wires the producer; the intent surface says phases are retired

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-192-an-acceptance-criterion-whose-producer.md:16 — "An acceptance criterion whose producer does not exist is judged by whether this phase wires it"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:95 — "Phases are retired, and this check is what replaces the same-phase rule a bundle once carried"

itd-192's rule turns on one question, whether this phase wires the missing producer, and grades MET_WITH_CONCERNS or NOT_MET on the answer. The intent surface says phases are retired and that the bundle check replaces the old same-phase rule. With no phase as a delivery unit, the discipline's deciding term has no referent, and an auditor cannot apply it as written.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 460.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262042302710. Same unit problem in itd-192 as iss-2610262042302710, cited against the intent surface.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262033593092
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2