Development record
itd-91 puts its setup question in `/abcd:init` / `prepare-this-repo`; the board chapter says the `prepare-this-repo` page retired into the install.
issueopenminoriss-2610262034182114
itd-91 puts its setup question in /abcd:init / prepare-this-repo; the board chapter says the prepare-this-repo page retired into the install.
A sequencing impossibility (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-91-ai-attribution-preference.md:31— "in the onboarding surface (/abcd:init/prepare-this-repo)" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/08-abcd.md:459— "prepare-this-repo, whose page retired into"
itd-91 puts the AI-attribution question in an onboarding surface it names /abcd:init / prepare-this-repo. 08-abcd.md says the prepare-this-repo page retired into the install, a name answered with what replaced it. The intent depends on an onboarding surface that the brief no longer has.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 485.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262034182114 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262034182114-itd-91-puts-its-setup-question-in-abcd.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-91A Project Declares Once How It Wants AI Acknowledged — And Every Commit, PR, And Record Followsrelated
mentions2
- iss-2610262039224536itd-91 puts its setup question in `/abcd:init` / `prepare-this-repo`, but the register says repository preparation moved into ahoy's install section
- iss-2610262044429007The attribution-preference draft puts its setup question in `/abcd:init` / `prepare-this-repo`, surfaces the verb split retired or never had