Development record
itd-30 calls the promise-against-delivery agent `intent-fidelity-reviewer`; the intent chapter calls it `intent-auditor`.
issueopenminoriss-2610262034207649
itd-30 calls the promise-against-delivery agent intent-fidelity-reviewer; the intent chapter calls it intent-auditor.
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-30-design-fictions-as-intent-format.md:18— "intent-fidelity-reviewerreads either dialect against the same delivered reality" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:532— "intent-auditoris a single agent in the catalog (per05-internals/01-agents.md) that owns three roles."
itd-30 has intent-fidelity-reviewer judge both intent formats against delivered reality. 05-intent.md gives that job to intent-auditor, one agent that owns three roles, whose audit verb keeps 'review' for change-judgement under adr-40. These are two names for one agent.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 488.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262034207649 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262034207649-itd-30-calls-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-30Design Fictions As An Alternative Capture Format For Intentsrelated
mentions4
- adr-40Review, audit, lint, and gate are four buckets, separated by what each compares
- iss-2610262037339788itd-30 calls the fidelity auditor intent-fidelity-reviewer; the build brief calls that validator intent-auditor
- iss-2610262039093344itd-30 calls the fidelity agent `intent-fidelity-reviewer`, but the agent catalogue calls it `intent-auditor`
- iss-2610262044093076The agent that judges delivery against an intent is `intent-fidelity-reviewer` in itd-30 and the intent auditor in itd-24