Development record
itd-87 calls resolved and wontfixed issues 'dispositioned'; the capture chapter uses 'disposition' only for a researcher's answer to a reading item.
itd-87 calls resolved and wontfixed issues 'dispositioned'; the capture chapter uses 'disposition' only for a researcher's answer to a reading item.
A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-87-recurrence-escalation-in-capture.md:17— "matches one already dispositioned — resolved or wontfixed" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/06-capture.md:211— "A disposition records the researcher's answer to one reading"
In itd-87 a dispositioned entry is an issue closed by resolve or wontfix. In 06-capture.md a disposition is a separate record keyed to one reading item, with states such as accepted, declined and held, filed in the same ledger. One ledger term has two meanings, so 'matching against dispositioned entries' could also be read as matching against reading dispositions.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 494.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262034255735 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262034255735-itd-87-calls-resolved-and-wontfixed.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-87A Finding That Comes Back After You Closed It Tells You Something, And abcd Stops Throwing It Awayrelated