Development record
The what-next menu makes opening the board change the status in a Terminal; the board chapter promises bare `abcd` is strictly read-only.
The what-next menu makes opening the board change the status in a Terminal; the board chapter promises bare abcd is strictly read-only.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-2610031215002409-under-the-board-a-short-what-next-menu.md:22— "in a Terminal this is the one thing opening the board ever changes" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/08-abcd.md:6— "read-only, so it is safe to type at any moment, including the moment you are"
itd-2610031215002409 says that in a Terminal, setting the waiting-on status is the one thing opening the board ever changes, and its decisions call this a reversal of the chapter's promise. 08-abcd.md still says bare abcd is strictly read-only and safe to type at any moment. The two documents disagree about whether opening the board writes anything.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 496.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. The menu is unbuilt, and the intent records the reversal and the edits it makes to the chapter and page when it ships.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262034261541 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262034261541-the-what-next-menu-makes-opening-the.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2610031215002409A 'what next?' menu under the board offers the next step, in a Terminal and in a Claude Code sessionrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.