The intent chapter records hand verification as a separate JSON verification receipt; itd-50 rules it is a grounds entry, not a separate receipt.

The intent chapter records hand verification as a separate JSON verification receipt; itd-50 rules it is a grounds entry, not a separate receipt.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:598 — "a separate JSON artifact under .abcd/.work.local/logs/audit/verify-<ts>/receipt.json, never merged into ## Audit Notes"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-50-loop-toward-acceptance.md:101 — "in the product thinker's words, not a separate receipt"

05-intent specifies the product thinker's sign-off as a verification receipt distinct from the machine verdict: a separate JSON artifact in the local logs tier, never merged into Audit Notes, with offered, accepted and rejected_wrong_criteria states. itd-50's decision 4 rules that hand verification is a grounds entry in the product thinker's words, not a separate receipt. One design keeps the sign-off in a local-tier receipt with its own states, the other in the record's append-only grounds; both cannot be what the loop delivers.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 506.