The intent chapter names the Role 1 fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-50 calls the same actor intent-fidelity-reviewer.

The intent chapter names the Role 1 fidelity agent intent-auditor; itd-50 calls the same actor intent-fidelity-reviewer.

A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:532 — "intent-auditor is a single agent in the catalog"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/planned/itd-50-loop-toward-acceptance.md:25 — "the intent-fidelity-reviewer records a NOT_MET verdict"

05-intent states that intent-auditor is a single agent in the catalog owning three roles, Role 1 being the one that records per-criterion NOT_MET verdicts, and reserves the word review for family-1 change judgement under adr-40. itd-50's press release has the intent-fidelity-reviewer record the NOT_MET verdict. Two names for one agent, one of them in the register the chapter reserves for change review, leaves a builder of the loop unsure which agent it dispatches.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 507.