Development record
itd-2609020625405251 makes a condition's standing the latest block naming it; the intent chapter lets a reading-occasioned block stand over a later verdict that does not name its occasion.
itd-2609020625405251 makes a condition's standing the latest block naming it; the intent chapter lets a reading-occasioned block stand over a later verdict that does not name its occasion.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609020625405251-a-scope-condition-is-dispositioned-from.md:34— "A condition's standing disposition is the one in the latest block that names it" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:331— "A condition's standing is its latest reading-occasioned block where it has one, and otherwise its latest verdict block"
The condition intent says a condition's standing disposition is the one in the latest block that names it, whichever writer wrote that block. 05-intent says the standing is the latest reading-occasioned block where one exists, otherwise the latest verdict block, and that a verdict overrides a reading-occasioned block only where its rationale names that block's occasion, wherever the two sit in the section. A later verdict that does not name the occasion is the standing under the first rule and is overridden under the second, so the fold, and whatever reads a condition's standing from it, differs.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 519.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. condition_test.go holds the delivered rule.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262034445775 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262034445775-itd-2609020625405251-makes-a-condition-s.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2609020625405251A scope condition is dispositioned from a reading run, keyed to the condition's identity and joined to the item that occasioned itrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.