This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The intent surface page names the roadmap phase plan as the canonical build order; itd-2609211913453478 retires phases and puts sequencing in dependencies and the lifecycle shelves.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262034508480

The intent surface page names the roadmap phase plan as the canonical build order; itd-2609211913453478 retires phases and puts sequencing in dependencies and the lifecycle shelves.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:74 — "ID number is not an execution-order guarantee — the canonical build order is the phase plan at"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609211913453478-one-page-in-the-glossary-maps-abcd-s.md:55 — "Phases and milestones are retired; sequencing is dependencies plus the lifecycle shelves"

05-intent.md says an intent id is not an execution-order guarantee because the canonical build order is the phase plan under roadmap/phases/, and still describes planned/ as scoped into a roadmap phase. The shipped glossary intent rules that phases and milestones are retired and that sequencing is dependencies plus the lifecycle shelves, with the phase documents kept only as history. Both cannot name the source of build order: a reader following the surface page is sent to a retired plan rather than to the dependency edges and the shelves.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 527.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262033248041. Same End A (05-intent.md line 74); End B is the shipped glossary intent that retires phases.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262034508480
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2