This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-28 says no abcd verb files a dated review folder; the intent surface page has the consistency pass write a dated report under .abcd/work/reviews/.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262034543078

itd-28 says no abcd verb files a dated review folder; the intent surface page has the consistency pass write a dated report under .abcd/work/reviews/.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-28-rp-reviews-into-flow.md:117 — "No abcd verb files a dated review folder: the semantic-gate receipts are abcd's only writer under .abcd/work/reviews/"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:622 — "The report lands at .abcd/work/reviews/<date>-consistency/00-summary.md for the corpus"

itd-28's decision 3 states that the semantic-gate receipts are abcd's only writer under .abcd/work/reviews/ and that no abcd verb files a dated review folder, so the dated folders are commissioned by hand. 05-intent.md says the consistency pass's report lands at .abcd/work/reviews/< date>-consistency/00-summary.md, written by its ingest with a review_of_commit pin. Either the consistency ingest is an abcd writer of dated review folders or no such writer exists; the shipped record's account of who writes the reviews shelf no longer matches the surface.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 532.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. internal/core/intent/consistency.go files the dated consistency folder under the reviews shelf with the pin, after itd-28's decision, which anticipated exactly such a writer.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262034543078
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions1