itd-4 has capture promote call intent new with the issue's body; the capture surface page says promotion mints the draft natively with a by-id pointer, not a copy.

itd-4 has capture promote call intent new with the issue's body; the capture surface page says promotion mints the draft natively with a by-id pointer, not a copy.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-4-issue-capture.md:35 — "promote an iss-N entry to an intent draft (calls /abcd:intent new with the entry body + bidirectional link)"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/06-capture.md:186 — "with the slug reused and the body a by-id pointer rather than a copy"

itd-4 scopes capture promote as calling /abcd:intent new with the entry body and a bidirectional link. 06-capture.md says one invocation mints the draft itself, with the slug reused and the body a by-id pointer rather than a copy, and that this native promotion superseded an earlier command-orchestrated flow; intent new was also removed by itd-2609212130136102. A promoted draft cannot both carry the issue's body through intent new and only point at the issue by id.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 533.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262045478245. Same A line and same root cause; internal/core/capture/promote.go mints the draft natively with a by-id pointer (itd-119).