itd-36 says the lifeboat licence gate refuses to surface kept originals; the library surface page says that gate is not built and the ingest never refuses on a licence.

itd-36 says the lifeboat licence gate refuses to surface kept originals; the library surface page says that gate is not built and the ingest never refuses on a licence.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-36-memory-unification.md:44 — "the lifeboat licence gate refuses to surface sources/ files without an explicit allowlist entry"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/07-library.md:362 — "is not built, and the shipped ingest classifies restrictive licences without"

itd-36 scopes keeping originals under .abcd/memory/sources/ behind a lifeboat licence gate that refuses to surface those files without an explicit allowlist entry. 07-library.md says the licence gate belongs to the lifeboat, that the gate is not built, and that the shipped ingest classifies restrictive licences without ever refusing on them. The intent's scope likewise lists a curator role on principle-distiller that the library page lists as not built, while the same page calls itd-36 non-decomposable. A shipped intent cannot rely on a gate the surface page says does not exist.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 537.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The shipped record already says the restrictive-licence gate waits on another record, and the library page states the same fact, so nothing contradicts.