Development record
itd-28's press release lands spec-tied reviews in a store under .abcd/reviews/< spec-id>/; the board reads reviews as dated folders under .abcd/work/reviews/.
itd-28's press release lands spec-tied reviews in a store under .abcd/reviews/< spec-id>/; the board reads reviews as dated folders under .abcd/work/reviews/.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-28-rp-reviews-into-flow.md:33— "in a per-review directory at.abcd/reviews/<spec-id>/<NNNN>-<slug>-<ref>/" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/08-abcd.md:290— "Every folder under.abcd/work/reviews/is a row: a dated"
itd-28's press release and scope say every spec-tied review lands as review.json and review.md in a per-review directory at .abcd/reviews/< spec-id>/< NNNN>-< slug>-< ref>/, with an index command and a CI check over that tree. 08-abcd.md says every folder under .abcd/work/reviews/ is a review row, a spec's review carrying its id in a dated folder name. The intent's own decision 1 drops that store, but its press release and scope still state it, so the shipped record describes a review location the surface does not read.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 540.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The record says in its banner that the press release and scope are read through the re-scope; internal/core/reviews reads the dated folders and receipt directories, not a per-spec store.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262035005988 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262035005988-itd-28-s-press-release-lands-spec-tied.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-28Spec-Tied Reviews Live Next To The Spec They Reviewedrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.