This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-48's press release says the shape role went live as a working verb; the intent chapter says itd-48 did not build the shape role

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262035033556

itd-48's press release says the shape role went live as a working verb; the intent chapter says itd-48 did not build the shape role

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-48-intent-fidelity-reviewer-roles-2-3.md:24 — "With all three roles live, /abcd:intent consistency and /abcd:intent shape move from documented command surface to working command surface."
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:616 — "The shape role below is not built by itd-48: on 2026-09-21 the product thinker re-homed it to itd-34's kinds lint, and the overlap question to itd-42's pre-pass."

itd-48 announces that with all three roles live, /abcd:intent shape moves to a working command surface. The intent chapter says the shape role is not built by itd-48 and was re-homed to itd-34's kinds lint. Both cannot be true of the same shipped record: one says the shape verb exists because of itd-48, the other says itd-48 never delivered it.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 544.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262032131693. Same A line and root cause; 05-intent.md's sentence is the one that records the re-homing.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262035033556
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions4