Development record
itd-80 names the verdict-ingest verb abcd intent review ingest; the intent chapter's command tree names it abcd intent audit ingest
itd-80 names the verdict-ingest verb abcd intent review ingest; the intent chapter's command tree names it abcd intent audit ingest
A naming conflict (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-80-intent-lifecycle-automation.md:32— "abcd intent review ingestingests a verdict" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:733— "Sub-verbs:abcd intent audit ingest."
itd-80 says abcd intent review ingest ingests a verdict. The chapter's generated appendix lists the only ingest under abcd intent audit as abcd intent audit ingest, and no review sub-verb exists. The chapter also keeps the word review for change-judgement verbs, apart from the audit verb that writes these verdicts. So one operation carries two verb names.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 547.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The CLI registers ingest under the audit family; itd-80 uses the pre-rename verb.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262035065340 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262035065340-itd-80-names-the-verdict-ingest-verb.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-80An Intent Ships Itself: `planned → shipped` Follows Its Spec Closing, With A Fidelity Audit Attachedrelated
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.