This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-53 says entries with no backend stay deferred; the intent chapter says such entries stay owed

issuewontfixnitpickiss-2610262035112905

itd-53 says entries with no backend stay deferred; the intent chapter says such entries stay owed

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-53-review-queue-auto-drain-fidelity-gate.md:35 — "No-backend behavior: entries stay deferred (not failed), so a headless run never blocks on an unreachable backend."
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:328 — "with no auditor available every entry stays owed and the summary says why nothing ran"

itd-53 names the no-backend state of a queued review deferred. The intent chapter describes the same situation, no auditor available, as every entry staying owed, and its receipt vocabulary (owed, ingested, dead-lettered) has no deferred state. The same state is named with two different words.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 554.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. The code names the state owed (internal/core/capture/auditowed.go) and has no deferred state for fidelity reviews; itd-53's banner drops the drainer that used the old word.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262035112905
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severitynitpick

References1

mentions2