itd-94 says autonomous drain runs are held by the intent readiness gate; the intent chapter says the drain verb's lanes are issues

itd-94 says autonomous drain runs are held by the intent readiness gate; the intent chapter says the drain verb's lanes are issues

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-94-an-intent-that-is-not-planned-cannot-be.md:25 — "Autonomous drain runs get the same gate for free: exit 1 is a journaled SKIP, never a guess."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/05-intent.md:278 — "a run of the top-level drain verb never does, since its lanes are issues and an issue has no criteria."

itd-94 says autonomous drain runs get the implement-readiness gate for free, so exit 1 becomes a journaled SKIP. The intent chapter says the lanes of the top-level drain verb are issues, which have no acceptance criteria. An intent readiness gate has no intent to judge in a run whose lanes are issues, so the two documents disagree about what drain runs work on.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 555.