Development record
itd-43 rules its reviews rename moot because no reviews subsystem classifies reviews by kind; the status-board chapter describes a reviews reader whose rows carry a kind and a spec
itd-43 rules its reviews rename moot because no reviews subsystem classifies reviews by kind; the status-board chapter describes a reviews reader whose rows carry a kind and a spec
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-43-epic-to-spec-terminology.md:41— "the Go tree has no reviews subsystem that classifies reviews by kind, so none of these surfaces exists to rename." - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/08-abcd.md:311— "each rowfolder,kind(revieworreceipt),scope,specwhen the name carries one"
itd-43 says the Go tree has no reviews subsystem that classifies reviews by kind, so there is nothing to rename. The status-board chapter describes a reviews reader whose rows each carry a kind (review or receipt) and a spec read from the folder name. The premise behind the moot ruling no longer matches the surface the brief documents.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 562.
Grounds
- declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): the two ends do not conflict when read in full. internal/core/reviews was added three days after the itd-43 ruling and classifies folders as review or receipt, not by the review-type token itd-43 meant, so no surface is left to rename.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262035181369 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | wontfix |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/wontfix/iss-2610262035181369-itd-43-rules-its-reviews-rename-moot.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-43abcd Speaks One Word for a Specced Block of Work, and That Word Is "Spec"related
mentions1
- dcn-26102711123305362026-10-27 — The product thinker accepted on 2026-10-27 the triage of the 1301 records the 2026-10-26 consistency pass filed. The duplicates, the records a later record already settles, the ones that are no contradiction and the one already fixed are closed with each reader's reason. Every other record gets its fix as its remedy, the rulings' accepted answers included, so a drain can take it. The 45 major records left open are deferred past v0.15.1, because the brief's single-home rewrite rewrites or removes most of the passages they quote. The person ruled the major rulings one at a time; the minor rulings take their recommended answers.