The banlist chapter says this repository's docs-lint `names/` entries read `name_roots` that include `.abcd`; the lint contract limits docs-currency to `docs/` and the repo-root prose.

The banlist chapter says this repository's docs-lint names/ entries read name_roots that include .abcd; the lint contract limits docs-currency to docs/ and the repo-root prose.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/20-banlist.md:79 — "This repository's name_roots are .abcd, AGENTS.md,"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/06-lint.md:10 — "lints docs/ and the repo-root prose for change-narration"

20-banlist says the names/ entries of .abcd/docs-lint.json also read the configuration's name_roots, and that this repository's are .abcd, AGENTS.md, scripts and the other shipped surfaces. 06-lint describes the docs-currency gate, configured by that same file, as linting docs/ and the repo-root prose, and assigns .abcd/development/ to record-currency. Both cannot describe the docs gate's reach: by the banlist chapter it reads the design record, and by the lint contract it does not.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 578.