The history chapter says no shipped surface but `history` reads the transcript store; the adapters chapter gives disembark a transcript reader that reads the same corpus.

The history chapter says no shipped surface but history reads the transcript store; the adapters chapter gives disembark a transcript reader that reads the same corpus.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/11-history.md:393 — "No shipped surface reads the store but history itself"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/02-adapters.md:350 — "Reads the root-SHA-keyed local corpus; merge by timestamp/content hash when an imported specstory source is also present"

11-history says that nothing distils the store yet and that no shipped surface reads it except history itself. 02-adapters lists, among the source readers disembark uses to fill a lifeboat, a transcript reader over the native transcript store (internal/core/history). It describes that reader in the present tense and does not mark it as a design target, as it does for the claude_md reader's git history. Disembark is shipped, so either it reads the transcript store or the reader is unbuilt. The two chapters cannot both be right.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 581.