The glossary says the reading chapter writes 'reading position' in full on first use; the chapter opens with bare 'position' and never writes the full phrase

The glossary says the reading chapter writes 'reading position' in full on first use; the chapter opens with bare 'position' and never writes the full phrase

A terminology drift (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/reading-position.md:34 — "The record writes the full phrase on first use and drops to bare "position" inside the reading chapter"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/23-reading.md:40 — "Assembly takes a position and a target state, and nothing else."

The reading-position entry describes how the record spells the term: the full phrase on first use, then bare 'position' inside the reading chapter. The reading chapter's first use is bare ('Assembly takes a position and a target state') and the phrase 'reading position' does not appear in it, so the spelling convention the glossary records for this chapter is not the one the chapter follows.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 593.