The glossary says a record, an ADR included, carries no status field; the decide chapter mints ADRs with a `status: proposed` field the author later changes

The glossary says a record, an ADR included, carries no status field; the decide chapter mints ADRs with a status: proposed field the author later changes

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/glossary/core/record.md:20 — "Lifecycle is directory-as-truth — a record moves between buckets rather than carrying a status field."
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/24-decide.md:160 — "and the record lands with status: proposed"

record.md names an ADR (adr-N) as a record and states that lifecycle is directory-as-truth, with a record moving between buckets rather than carrying a status field. The decide chapter says a freshly minted ADR lands with status: proposed, that the author sets accepted when the decision is in force, and that the index row's status comes from the record's frontmatter. So ADR lifecycle is held in a status field, not in a folder.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 600.